Translate

Sunday, 30 September 2007

Wedding of Sophie de Geer & Marcus Josefsson


With the coloured leaves falling to the ground and a brisk autumn air filling the athmosphere, Sophie de Geer and Marcus Josefsson had chosen the last Saturday of September 2007 as their wedding date.

The ceremony was held in the small Eds church near the bride's family's estate, Stora Wäsby, in Upplands Väsby Municipality outside Stockholm at 4 o'clock in the afternoon. Sophie, daughter of Baron Carl and Baroness Christina de Geer, has been seen alongside Marcus for some time now and earlier this year she saw her brother Baron Jacob walk down the aisle together with Nicole Kreuger.

Crown Princess Victoria and her boyfriend Daniel attended the wedding just as they've done for previous de Geer weddings, the bride's parents are close friends of the King and Queen and the bride Sophie and her sister Lovisa are great friends of the royal children. The Crown Princess was dressed in a new blue dress and a short fur jacket plus her signature mark, the ponytail (!).

Thursday, 27 September 2007

Kritiek op politieke rol Raad van State - Uitspraken adelsprocessen ook ter discussie


Gebaseerd op advies van de Raad van State heeft het kabinet besloten geen referendum te houden over het Europees Verdrag. „De Raad heeft de regering politiek een uitweg geboden", zegt een criticus.

„Laat ik voorop stellen dat dit geen juridisch advies is, maar een politiek advies”, zegt René Barents, hoofd onderzoek en documentatie van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie en deeltijdhoogleraar Europees recht in Maastricht.

„Dit advies van de Raad van State had ik wel verwacht. De Raad heeft de reputatie de regering niet in de wielen te rijden”, meent Nico Baakman, als politicoloog verbonden aan de Universiteit van Maastricht.

Het advies van de Raad van State aan de regering over het wel of niet houden van een referendum over het Europees Hervormingsverdrag heeft rechtdeskundigen niet echt verbaasd. Zij verwijten het hoogste adviescollege van de regering teveel politiek te bedrijven.

„Het verschil dat de Raad aanbrengt tussen de verworpen Europese Grondwet en het nieuwe Verdrag is wat gekunsteld, want inhoudelijk is er weinig veranderd”, oordeelt Deirdre Curtin, hoogleraar recht en bestuur van internationale organisaties aan de Universiteit Utrecht. Zij won eerder dit jaar de Spinoza-prijs, de belangrijkste prijs voor Nederlandse onderzoekers. Overigens zegt Curtin zich wel „redelijk goed” te kunnen vinden in het advies van de Raad, omdat ook zij veel waarde hecht aan het ontbreken van de „retoriek en symboliek” van de Europese Grondwet in het nieuwe Verdrag.

Op basis van het advies van de Raad van State besloot het kabinet geen referendum te houden. Ook bij de beslissing van de PvdA-fractie deze week tegen een referendum speelde het advies van de Raad een grote rol.

De bepalingen in het nieuwe Verdrag wijken volgens de Raad van State weliswaar weinig af van de eerder verworpen Grondwet, maar veranderingen als het schrappen van symbolen geven het Verdrag volgens de Raad een niet-grondwettelijk karakter.

Deskundigen op het gebied van het Europees bestuur oordeelden eerder in deze krant, kort voordat het advies van de Raad bekend werd gemaakt, dat de ‘oude’ Europese Grondwet en het ‘nieuwe’ Hervormingsverdrag in juridisch opzicht bijna als twee druppels water op elkaar lijken.

De Raad adviseerde in 2003 dat de in 2005 verworpen Europese Grondwet van constitutionele aard was, zegt Tijn Kortmann. „Dan het Hervormingsverdrag ook.” De verschillen zijn volgens hem minimaal, cosmetisch. De vlag sneuvelde in het Verdrag, evenals het volkslied en een Europese minister van Buitenlandse Zaken. De staats- en bestuursrechtkundige Kortmann (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen), was voorzitter van de onafhankelijke commissie die in 2005 het referendum voorbereidde.

De deskundigen „constateren” dat de Raad het kabinet uit de brand heeft willen helpen. „Dat is geen verwijt, de Raad is nu eenmaal niet onafhankelijk”, meent Barents. „Dit advies is geschreven om de regering in alle opzichten tegemoet te komen, om het kabinet een argument te geven ‘nee’ te zeggen tegen een referendum.”

Volgens politicoloog Baakman was een referendum „een gigantisch probleem” geweest voor de regering. „De Raad heeft de regering met zijn advies politiek een uitweg geboden in een moeilijke discussie.”

Ook Baakman is van mening dat de Raad van State wat advisering betreft te politiek opereert. „Dat is ook niet gek”, zegt hij. „Kijk hoe ze worden gerekruteerd. Bij de benoeming van leden wordt rekening gehouden met de politieke kleur van de kandidaat. Bij een vacature bepalen de vicevoorzitter en vooraanstaande leden, de dorpsoudsten, naar welke politieke stroming de zetel gaat. Als een besluit is gevallen over de politieke kleur, gaat de dorpsoudste van die kleur op zoek naar passende kandidaten en vervolgens wordt een kandidaat voorgedragen bij Binnenlandse Zaken en Justitie: even benoemen alstublieft!”

De kritiek vindt weerklank in de Kamer, waar wordt gewerkt aan een wetsvoorstel dat het benoemingsbeleid verandert en de twee taken van de Raad, advies en rechtspraak, duidelijker scheidt.

Baakman verwondert zich over het amateurisme bij de Raad. Een kantonrechter, de laatste op de rechterlijke hiërarchische ladder, moet een zware opleiding van zes jaar doorlopen wil hij recht kunnen spreken in eenvoudige zaken. Van leden van de Raad wordt geen juridische ervaring gevraagd. „In de Raad krijgen oudere politici, voormalige bewindslieden en burgemeesters aan het einde van hun carrière de kans nog even door te marcheren.” Het is, aldus Baakman, kortzichtig om van zelfs ervaren bestuurders te verwachten dat ze het rechtspreken snel onder de knie krijgen. „Casuïstiek bedrijven leer je niet in een paar maanden.” Voormalige politici houden volgens hem ook te veel rekening met de politiek die ze immers door en door kennen.

„Als de vrees bestaat, en die bestaat, dat de Raad te veel begrip voor de regering heeft, is dat funest”, oordeelt Baakman. Begin dit jaar nam het Europese Hof voor de mensenrechten een klacht van een voormalige asielzoeker in behandeling, terwijl de klager geen beroep bij de Raad van State had ingesteld. Voorheen werden klagers die niet alle beroepsmogelijkheden in Nederland hadden bewandeld niet ontvankelijk verklaard.

In dit geval had de Somaliër de Raad terecht gepasseerd. Hij zou volgens het Hof ‘vrijwel geen enkele kans op succes’ hebben bij de Raad van State, omdat de Raad te vaak in het voordeel van de regering oordeelt. „Zeer schadelijk voor het imago van een rechtstaat”, aldus Baakman.

En heeft Tijn Kortmann dan geen visie op de Raad? „Jawel, maar die is voor in de kroeg.”

Door Wilmer Heck en Ahmet Olgun
Bron: nrc.nl

Tuesday, 25 September 2007

Ofcom shows gross disrespect to Lady Diana's memory













Channel 4 has been insensitive and disrespectful. Ofcom shows lack of responsibility.

A controversial television documentary about the death of Prince Diana was not insensitive, disrespectful or in breach of broadcasting standards, Britain's media watchdog Ofcom has ruled.

Ofcom is the independent regulator and competition authority for the UK communications industries, with responsibilities across television, radio, telecommunications and wireless communications services.

Ofcom rejected more than 60 complaints about the Channel 4 documentary, "Diana: The Witnesses in the Tunnel", about the events surrounding the 1997 death of the Princess of Wales in Paris.

The documentary, broadcast in June, focused on the paparazzo's role in the accident that also killed her boyfriend Dodi Fayed.

Channel 4, which welcomed the ruling, was at the centre of a bitter row after it was heavily criticised for airing the documentary -- watched by 3.8 million people -- that contained several pictures of the fatally injured Princess.

Her sons Prince Harry and Prince William wrote to the broadcaster pleading with it not to publish the poor quality, black and white pictures of their mother after the crash -- a request Channel 4 dismissed.

One image showed the Princess receiving oxygen from a French medic, which was used in his testimony about the fatal accident. Her face was obscured and her injuries not visible to viewers.

The Princes had described the film as a "gross disrespect" to their mother's memory.

Channel 4 aired the documentary saying it was in the wider public interest.

Ofcom on Monday rejected the complaints that Channel 4 had been insensitive and disrespectful and said the decision to air the documentary was "clearly a matter of public interest".

It said the controversial photographs were not used in a "gratuitous manner and were not sensationalised".

"The subject of this documentary is a highly sensitive issue and such photographs can understandably upset viewers and cause offence," it ruled.

"However, this was a serious piece of investigative journalism examining issues and events which remain firmly in the public consciousness.

"The photographs included in the programme were integral to the credibility of the argument being made and the corroborated first hand testimony."

Sunday, 23 September 2007

Danish Royal House: Frederik & Mary award their Culture Prize


Tonight the Crown Prince Couple have awarded their annual Culture Prize at the Opera House in Copenhagen. At this awards and concert evening, the couple honour the work of idividuals and humanitarian organisations with large donations. This year Danish actress Sonja Richter and the charity organisation Ventilen have been awarded the prize.

Source: Danish Royal Watchers

Verschenen boek: Jonkheer D.J. de Geer, De teloorgang van een ministerpresident


Jonkheer Dirk Jan de Geer (1870-1960) wordt tegenwoordig bijna uitsluitend herinnerd als een man die door zijn knieën ging voor de Duitsers, als een man die zich aan niets minder dan landverraad schuldig had gemaakt. Men vergeet daarbij wat De Geer ook was: een van de gezichtsbepalende politici uit de eerste helft van de twintigste eeuw. Hij was onbetwist leider van de Christelijk-Historische Unie, viermaal minister en tweemaal minister-president. Zijn deskundigheid op juridisch en financieel terrein was onomstreden, en ook was hij een goede wetgever.

Deze biografie – de eerste – doet De Geer in al deze hoedanigheden recht. Het is het indringende portret van een man die in zijn persoonlijk leven als een sfinx werd omschreven: afstandelijk, ondoorgrondelijk en onvoorspelbaar, een man die rotsvast op zijn God vertrouwde, maar toch zo weerloos was als hij werd beproefd. En beproefd wérd hij. De tragiek van De Geer was dat hij na 1940 nog tientallen jaren te leven had, jaren die hij vulde met het schrijven van pamfletten en brochures tegen het onrecht, dat hem zou zijn aangedaan. Henk van Osch toont de lezer geen sfinx maar een mens, wiens levenverhaal ons onvermijdelijk confronteert met de vraag hoe wijzelf in zijn omstandigheden gereageerd zouden hebben.

Henk van Osch
Gebonden, € 29,50
Uitgeverij Boom
September 2007

Tuesday, 18 September 2007

Graf Zeppelin first flight was on September 18, 1928


Ferdinand Graf von Zeppelin (1838 -1917) was a German pioneer of aeronautics, renowned for his huge airships. In 1900 he constructed the first ever dirigible aero fixed airship ZEPPELIN "LZ 1". In 1909 he founded the Company Luftschiftbau Zeppelin GmbH, Friedrichhafen. With its worldwide air passenger services, Zeppelin was indeed the real founder of civil and commercial air traffic. The Count built up workshops that developed and produced engines, gear transmission machinery, envelopes and cellular gas bodies for the airships. "LZ 127 GRAF ZEPPELIN" and "LZ 129 HINDENBURG" were historic milestones never reached again. Between 1900 and 1938, ZEPPELIN GmbH constructed a total of more than 100 ZEPPELIN airships in 27 different versions. The largest aircraft to ever fly was "LZ 129" built in 1938, with a length of 804 feet, a diameter of 135 feet, and a volume of 7,063,000 cubic feet. The ship was powered by 4 Daimler diesel engines with 4,800 hp, and a maximum speed of 84 miles per hour. With a range of 7400 miles, the giant airships reached North and South America for transport of passengers, mail and freight.

The Graf Zeppelin is considered the finest airship ever built. It was named after the German pioneer of airships, Ferdinand von Zeppelin. The Graf Zeppelin flew more miles than any airship had done to that time or would in the future. Its first flight was on September 18, 1928. In August 1929, it circled the globe. Its flight began with a trip from Friedrichshafen, Germany, to Lakehurst, New Jersey, allowing William Randolph Hearst (American newspaper magnate), who had financed the trip in exchange for exclusive rights to the story, to claim that the voyage began from American soil. Piloted by Eckener, the craft stopped only at Tokyo, Japan, Los Angeles, California, and Lakehurst. The trip took 12 days—less time than the ocean trip from Tokyo to San Francisco.

After the flight, Dr. Eckener wrote that the Graf Zeppelin:

". . .was to prove that passengers could now be carried across the Atlantic Ocean by air in speed and safety, and with all the comfort and pleasure which the modern traveler demands."

In 1931 the Graf Zeppelin made three scheduled advertised flights carrying passengers and mail to South America, the first scheduled transatlantic air passenger flights in history. In 1932, scheduled passenger flights to South America in the Graf Zeppelin continued and plans were initiated to establish zeppelin travel throughout the world. In 1936, Eckener's dream came true as the Hindenburg made ten scheduled round trips from Germany to America, plus seven round trips to Brazil while the Graf Zeppelin made thirteen round trip flights to Rio. The financial results were impressive with Eckener noting that they were an "agreeable surprise."

During the ten years the Graf Zeppelin flew, it made 590 flights including 144 ocean crossings. It flew more than one million miles (1,609,344 kilometers), visited the United States, the Arctic, the Middle East, and South America, and carried 13,110 passengers.



Sunday, 16 September 2007

A King under question


There are indications that the Spanish Press is starting to end its generosity on reporting items about the Royal Family

EDITORIAL COMMENT of www.typicallyspanish.com

There was a piece in last weekend’s Sunday Times in the U.K. about King Juan Carlos. Titled – ‘Popular king who quashed a coup falls from favour with his subjects’.
Written by Thomas Catan in Madrid, it claims that there are signs that the King is in danger of falling out with his subjects.

It mentions the Catalan Republican Party, Esquerra Republicana, campaigning for the Spanish Royal Family to reveal how much they cost the taxpayer, and the response from the King appointing a new Royal Auditor.

The story from Russia last year of the King shooting a bear, made an easy target with an intake of vodka was also repeated, and the recent controversy over the El Jueves magazine cartoon showing the Prince and Princess of Asturias having sex also repeated.

The Sunday Times piece does say that polls show most Spaniards like and respect the King, despite, as the paper puts it ‘his lavish lifestyle and playboy reputation’.

On first read the Sunday Times piece appears to be somewhat extreme, in that such criticism is rarely heard in Spain, and maybe that is just the point. Just as after the Spanish Civil War a pact of silence was agreed on both sides, it seems that after the transition to democracy a similar thing happened regarding the Royal Family. Now the heated political debate in Spain has expanded to engulf the Royals who are no longer so untouchable in the Spanish media.

The cold facts which will come from the appointment of the new Royal Auditor, Óscar Moreno Gil, will be interesting, although we already know the Spanish Royal family cost the taxpayer 8.29 million € a year – that compares to 11.4 million in the U.K.

And the gossip media have been speculating this summer that King Juan Carlos does not like Princess Letizia, and hence generally ignores her in public. There has even been some speculation about a possible abdication by the King who is 70 on January 5th. Prince Felipe will be 39 a few days after.

It’s not the first time that the Spanish Royal Family has been in the firing line. Paul Preston’s biography on Juan Carlos caused a real upset in 2003 when he suggested that the King had told a friend that he had shot his brother Alfonso dead in 1956 when he was 18. Preston says the official statement that the gun just went off was inadequate, reminding his readers that at the time the King was an adult cadet at a military academy who knew how to handle guns.

Preston got tons of hate mail after that, but the Zarzuela Palace made no official comment.

It will be interesting to see how the Spanish press handles itself over forthcoming months. It seems that royalty sells papers, and so we can expect the Spanish Royal family to be firmly in the news.

Although polls are notoriously unreliable, my experience is that the Royal Family in general, and the King in particular, are still well-loved in Spain.

Saturday, 15 September 2007

MESSAGGIO DI S.A.R. EMANUELE FILIBERTO DI SAVOIA PRINCIPE DI PIEMONTE E DI VENEZIA


IN OCCASIONE DEL 103° ANNIVERSARIO DELLA NASCITA
DI S.M. RE UMBERTO II - 15 SETTEMBRE 2007

Oggi si celebra l’anniversario della nascita di mio nonno Re Umberto II. Egli nacque a Racconigi, città tanto cara alla Dinastia, il lieto evento fu festeggiato in tutto il Paese perché era un segno di continuità e certezza per il futuro della Patria. Di mio nonno ricordo la grande umanità, l’intelligenza e la preparazione storica ma soprattutto la dignità con cui sopportava il dolore causatogli dalla lontananza dall’Italia e dagli italiani che amava profondamente.

Quando salì al Trono come quarto Re d’Italia trovò un Paese con una grave situazione politica, sociale, ed istituzionale a causa degli anni di Guerra che ne avevano fortemente provato la popolazione. La sua incessante opera per il bene della Patria iniziò ben prima di cingere la Corona: al momento della sua investitura quale Luogotenente del Regno si adoperò affinché le pressioni degli Alleati non rischiassero di spaccare in due il Paese, cercò con fermezza di rendere meno gravi le condizioni della popolazione oramai straziata dai lunghi anni di guerra.

Egli fu uomo dalla straordinaria dignità che seppe comprendere appieno il ruolo impostogli dalla storia e cercò con spontaneità e sensibilità di portarsi sempre più vicino a tutti gli italiani. Era ben consapevole del ruolo della Donna nella società moderna e con uno dei suoi primi decreti Le conferì il diritto di voto.

Seppe anche comprendere, con decenni di anticipo rispetto alla classe politica, la grandissima importanza delle tradizioni e delle culture regionali. Si impegnò con forza affinché la Sicilia avesse una sua autonomia e promulgò, nel Maggio del 1946, lo Statuto della Regione. Nel suo lungimirante progetto prevedeva di dotare tutte le regioni d’Italia della stessa autonomia nel rispetto della solidarietà e dei valori dell’Unità che Casa Savoia stessa rappresentava e garantiva.

Purtroppo non gli fu data occasione di dimostrare le Sue grandi doti di Sovrano. Negli anni dell’esilio si è sempre dimostrato vicino agli italiani, amava profondamente l’Italia ed i suoi concittadini: non c’era giorno in cui Egli non tenesse vivi i contatti con la Patria incontrando moltissimi italiani in visita a Cascais. Anche negli anni lunghi e dolorosi della malattia non riusciva rimanere isolato dal suo più grande amore; gli italiani.

Ricordo con affetto e devozione mio nonno Re Umberto II, fu un esempio di umanità, dignità e rispetto; un vero depositario dei Valori su cui si fonda la nostra Patria!

In queste giornate concitate, in cui lo scontro politico ed istituzione e la divisione sono all’ordine del giorno, vorrei ricordare a tutti l’esempio che diede Re Umberto II che fece il massimo sacrificio per l’unità e la pace dell’Italia!

Wednesday, 12 September 2007

Ethiopian Emperor’s Grandson Honors African Americans


H.I.H. Prince Ermias Sahle-Selassie Haile Selassie, grandson of H.I.M. Emperor Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia placed a wreath of red, yellow and green flowers at the African American Civil War Memorial on September 12th, the first day of the 3rd Ethiopian Millennium - (Ethiopia still follows the original Egyptian Calendar.) Surrounded by a group of Ethiopian religious and military officials, and other leaders in the Ethiopian, African American and Ethiopian World Federation community, H.I.H. Prince Ermias spoke eloquently about the debt Ethiopians owe to the African American community for their support during Mussolini’s Fascist invasion of Ethiopia, and their struggle for civil rights enabling Ethiopian Americans to participate in American society with dignity.

The congregation then proceeded to New Bethel Baptist Church for a ceremony featuring speakers including; Chris Haley, nephew of Alex Haley, and Director of the Study of the Legacy of Slavery in Maryland at the Maryland State Archives; Nebiat Solomon, Director of the Office of African Affairs in the Office of the Mayor Fenty and Ward One Councilman Jim Graham who brought the elephant tusks residing at City Hall that Emperor Selassie donated to Washington during his visit in 1954.

H.I.H. Prince Ermias made an impassioned speech invoking the historical ties between Africans in the Diaspora, and a commitment to make the future more peaceful and prosperous for Africa and the world. Photos were displayed of African American pilots Herbert Julian, aka “The Black Eagle,” and Colonel John Robinson who both commanded Ethiopian Air Forces against the Italians; Dr. Melaku Bayen, the first Ethiopian medical school graduate in the US, who founded the Ethiopian Research Council with diplomat Dr. Ralphe Bunche and historian Dr. William Leo Hansberry at Howard University; H.I.M. Haile Selassie presenting an Ethiopian Cross to Pastor and Congressman Adam Clayton Powell Jr. at the Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem; and jazz great Duke Ellington performing in Ethiopia.

More activities are being planned to provide opportunities to strengthen the relationship between the Ethiopian and African American communities in Washington, DC for the future including a religious pilgrimage to Ethiopia, cultural education programs, and grassroots actions on various local issues.

Monday, 10 September 2007

Adel in der DDR - Herrenschreiter auf sowjetrotem Teppich


Hans Michael Kloth

Nicht alle ostdeutschen Adeligen gingen nach 1945 in den Westen. Wer als Edelmann im Arbeiter- und Bauernstaat blieb, wurde oft genug nur wegen seines Namens schikaniert - oder aber er machte damit Karriere.

Nach dem Mauerfall 1990 sind sie zurückgekehrt: All die Puttbusse und Pillnitze, die Arnims und Alvenslebens haben ihre einstigen Familiensitze im Osten dieses Landes zurückgekauft oder - wenn ihre Väter und Großväter den Anstand besessen hatten, sich Hitler entgegenzustellen - zurückbekommen.

Mancherorts sind die Heimkehrer mit offenen Armen als Investoren oder sogar als die alten "Herrschaften" aufgenommen worden. Weit häufiger schlug ihnen herzliche Ablehnung entgegen, erfüllten sie das Klischee der sozialistisch sozialisierten Normalbürger Ost doch gleich dreifach: Wessi, Kapitalist - und von Adel.

Zwar war Karl Marx höchstselbst mit einem adeligen Fräulein verehelicht gewesen; seine treue Jenny war eine geborene von Westphalen. In seinem Werk ließ er dennoch kein gutes Haar am ersten Stand: Statt in "Treue, Liebe, Glauben" mache der Adel "nun vor allem in Runkelrüben, Schnaps und Wolle", spottete er Ende 1848 in der "Rheinischen Zeitung".

Feudaler Glanz für die Genossen

"Ihr unheilvoller Einfluss", dozierte auch das SED-offizielle "Wörterbuch der Geschichte" unter dem Stichwort "Junker", "trug wesentlich zu dem besonders aggressiven Charakter des deutschen Imperialismus bei." Kein Wunder also, dass nach der Machtübernahme der Kommunisten 1945 die so Geschmähten fast geschlossen die Elbseite gen Westen wechselten.

Doch eben nur fast geschlossen. Denn trotz der Hatz der neuen Herren auf alles, was im Sozialismus nach alten feudalistischen Zöpfen aussah, blieb eine Handvoll Adeliger daheim - als bloße "Bürger", und dann auch noch der "DDR".

Wie viele ihrer blaublütigen Standesgenossen unter der roten Diktatur ausharrten, weiß man nicht einmal bei den Adelsverbänden. Der "Verein sächsischer Adel" immerhin schickte zwischen 1956 und 1960 Pakete an gerade noch 87 Vettern und Basen mit "Sowjetzonen-Adressen", dafür im Gegenwert von immerhin 10.000 Mark West.

Mehr: EinesTages

Sunday, 9 September 2007

Prince Nicholas of Montenegro decorates the Montenegrin Ambassador to the UN


MONTENEGRIN AMBASSADOR TO NEW YORK, NJEBOSA KALUDJEROVIC, RECEIVES THE GRAND CROSS OF THE ORDER OF DANILO I OF MONTENEGRO

The Montenegrin Ambassador to the United Nations, His Excellency, Ambassador Njebosa Kaludjerovic, has received the highest rank of the Order of Danilo I, the Grand Cross, from Prince Nikola Petrovic Njegos at a ceremony in New York.

The high award has been issued to a representative from an old family and an old Country that has now found a new place in the world. Celebrating Montenegro's admission as the 192nd member state of the United Nations and on May 11, 2007 Prince Nikola has recognised this important point in Montenegro's and at the ceremony said:

Montenegro's place in the family of nations is symbolised by her flag which now flies at the United Nations building in New York, it is the flag of our restored Sovereign State and it is the symbol of my own family. This is a proud chapter in our countries history and it should be marked by the granting of the Order of Danilo I to our first Ambassador in New York. Ambassador Kaludjerovic has done much to promote Montenegro and to ensure our presence her is known and appreciated. I am proud that he now wears this important decoration, one that has deep roots in the history and traditions of an independent and Sovereign Montenegro.

Saturday, 8 September 2007

Courtly love

Courtly love was a medieval European notion of ennobling love which found its genesis in the ducal and princely courts in regions of present-day southern France at the end of the 11th century. In essence, courtly love was a contradictory experience between erotic desire and spiritual attainment, "a love at once illicit and morally elevating, passionate and self-disciplined, humiliating and exalting, human and transcendent".

The term "courtly love" was first popularized by Gaston Paris in 1883, and has since come under a wide variety of definitions and uses, even being dismissed as nineteenth-century romantic fiction. Its interpretation, origins and influences continue to be a matter of discourse.

Friday, 7 September 2007

Fiançailles du duc d’Anjou et de la duchesse de Cadaval


Paris, 7 September 2007

His Royal Highness Prince Charles-Philippe d’Orléans, Duke of Anjou, and Diana Álvares Pereira de Melo, Duchess of Cadaval, are delighted to announce their engagement.

The Duke of Anjou and the Duchess of Cadaval first met in the summer of 2005 at a charitable gala dinner in Lisbon organized by the Sovereign Military Order of Malta.

The Duke of Anjou is the son of Their Royal Highnesses Prince and Princess Michel of France. He is the nephew of His Royal Highness the Count of Paris, Duke of France, head of the royal house of France. Prince Charles-Philippe has been the Grand Master of the Order of Saint Lazarus since 2004. He is co-founder of an international development consultancy. The Prince had a nine-year military career as an officer in the French army, during which he was decorated by France and by foreign states and international organizations. He has also received a number of honorary civil distinctions from various countries. The Prince currently resides in Paris and Estoril and is aged 34.

The Duchess of Cadaval is the daughter of Dom Jaime, 10th Duke of Cadaval, and Dona Claudine Álvarez Pereira de Melo. Diana became the 11th Duchess of Cadaval on the death of her father in 2001. The Duchess of Cadaval studied international communications at the American University in Paris. Having worked at Christie’s in London, the Duchess returned to Portugal to manage family matters, in particular the Cadaval Palace in Évora. The Duchess of Cadaval is aged 29. She is a Dame of Honour and Devotion of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta.

The Duke of Anjou and the Duchess of Cadaval will enter into the sacred bond of marriage in June 2008 in Évora, Portugal. The ceremonies will take place in church and at the Cadaval Palace.

Thursday, 6 September 2007

Address by HIM Emperor Haile Selassie I to the United Nations - 6 October 1963



Mr. President, Distinguished Delegates:

Twenty-seven years ago, as Emperor of Ethiopia, I mounted the rostrum in Geneva, Switzerland, to address the League of Nations and to appeal for relief from the destruction which had been unleashed against my defenseless nation, by the Fascist invader.I spoke then both to and for the conscience of the world. My words went unheeded, but history testifies to the accuracy of the warning that I gave in 1936.

Today, I stand before the world organization which has succeeded to the mantle discarded by its discredited predecessor. In this body is enshrined the principle of collective security which I unsuccessfully invoked at Geneva. Here, in this Assembly, reposes the best - perhaps the last - hope for the peaceful survival of mankind.

In 1936, I declared that it was not the Covenant of the League that was at stake, but international morality. Undertakings, I said then, are of little worth if the will to keep them is lacking. The Charter of the United Nations expresses the noblest aspirations of man: abjuration of force in the settlement of disputes between states; the assurance of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion; the safeguarding of international peace and security.

But these, too, as were the phrases of the Covenant, are only words; their value depends wholly on our will to observe and honor them and give them content and meaning. The preservation of peace and the guaranteeing of man's basic freedoms and rights require courage and eternal vigilance: courage to speak and act - and if necessary, to suffer and die - for truth and justice; eternal vigilance, that the least transgression of international morality shall not go undetected and unremedied. These lessons must be learned anew by each succeeding generation, and that generation is fortunate indeed which learns from other than its own bitter experience. This Organization and each of its members bear a crushing and awesome responsibility: to absorb the wisdom of history and to apply it to the problems of the present, in order that future generations may be born, and live, and die, in peace.

The record of the United Nations during the few short years of its life affords mankind a solid basis for encouragement and hope for the future. The United Nations has dared to act, when the League dared not in Palestine, in Korea, in Suez, in the Congo. There is not one among us today who does not conjecture upon the reaction of this body when motives and actions are called into question. The opinion of this Organization today acts as a powerful influence upon the decisions of its members. The spotlight of world opinion, focused by the United Nations upon the transgressions of the renegades of human society, has thus far proved an effective safeguard against unchecked aggression and unrestricted violation of human rights.

The United Nations continues to sense as the forum where nations whose interests clash may lay their cases before world opinion. It still provides the essential escape valve without which the slow build-up of pressures would have long since resulted in catastrophic explosion. Its actions and decisions have speeded the achievement of freedom by many peoples on the continents of Africa and Asia. Its efforts have contributed to the advancement of the standard of living of peoples in all corners of the world.

For this, all men must give thanks. As I stand here today, how faint, how remote are the memories of 1936.How different in 1963 are the attitudes of men. We then existed in an atmosphere of suffocating pessimism. Today, cautious yet buoyant optimism is the prevailing spirit. But each one of us here knows that what has been accomplished is not enough.

The United Nations judgments have been and continue to be subject to frustration, as individual member-states have ignored its pronouncements and disregarded its recommendations. The Organization's sinews have been weakened, as member-states have shirked their obligations to it. The authority of the Organization has been mocked, as individual member-states have proceeded, in violation of its commands, to pursue their own aims and ends. The troubles which continue to plague us virtually all arise among member states of the Organization, but the Organization remains impotent to enforce acceptable solutions. As the maker and enforcer of the international law, what the United Nations has achieved still falls regrettably short of our goal of an international community of nations.

This does not mean that the United Nations has failed. I have lived too long to cherish many illusions about the essential highmindedness of men when brought into stark confrontation with the issue of control over their security, and their property interests. Not even now, when so much is at hazard would many nations willingly entrust their destinies to other hands.

Yet, this is the ultimatum presented to us: secure the conditions whereby men will entrust their security to a larger entity, or risk annihilation; persuade men that their salvation rests in the subordination of national and local interests to the interests of humanity, or endanger man's future. These are the objectives, yesterday unobtainable, today essential, which we must labor to achieve.

Until this is accomplished, mankind's future remains hazardous and permanent peace a matter for speculation. There is no single magic formula, no one simple step, no words, whether written into the Organization's Charter or into a treaty between states, which can automatically guarantee to us what we seek. Peace is a day-to-day problem, the product of a multitude of events and judgments. Peace is not an "is", it is a "becoming." We cannot escape the dreadful possibility of catastrophe by miscalculation. But we can reach the right decisions on the myriad subordinate problems which each new day poses, and we can thereby make our contribution and perhaps the most that can be reasonably expected of us in 1963 to the preservation of peace. It is here that the United Nations has served us - not perfectly, but well. And in enhancing the possibilities that the Organization may serve us better, we serve and bring closer our most cherished goals.

I would mention briefly today two particular issues which are of deep concern to all men: disarmament and the establishment of true equality among men. Disarmament has become the urgent imperative of our time. I do not say this because I equate the absence of arms to peace, or because I believe that bringing an end to the nuclear arms race automatically guarantees the peace, or because the elimination of nuclear warheads from the arsenals of the world will bring in its wake that change in attitude requisite to the peaceful settlement of disputes between nations. Disarmament is vital today, quite simply, because of the immense destructive capacity of which men dispose.

Ethiopia supports the atmospheric nuclear test ban treaty as a step towards this goal, even though only a partial step. Nations can still perfect weapons of mass destruction by underground testing. There is no guarantee against the sudden, unannounced resumption of testing in the atmosphere.

The real significance of the treaty is that it admits of a tacit stalemate between the nations which negotiated it, a stalemate which recognizes the blunt, unavoidable fact that none would emerge from the total destruction which would be the lot of all in a nuclear war, a stalemate which affords us and the United Nations a breathing space in which to act.
Here is our opportunity and our challenge. If the nuclear powers are prepared to declare a truce, let us seize the moment to strengthen the institutions and procedures which will serve as the means for the pacific settlement of disputes among men. Conflicts between nations will continue to arise. The real issue is whether they are to be resolved by force, or by resort to peaceful methods and procedures, administered by impartial institutions. This very Organization itself is the greatest such institution, and it is in a more powerful United Nations that we seek, and it is here that we shall find, the assurance of a peaceful future.

Were a real and effective disarmament achieved and the funds now spent in the arms race devoted to the amelioration of man's state; were we to concentrate only on the peaceful uses of nuclear knowledge, how vastly and in how short a time might we change the conditions of mankind. This should be our goal.
When we talk of the equality of man, we find, also, a challenge and an opportunity; a challenge to breathe new life into the ideals enshrined in the Charter, an opportunity to bring men closer to freedom and true equality. and thus, closer to a love of peace.

The goal of the equality of man which we seek is the antithesis of the exploitation of one people by another with which the pages of history and in particular those written of the African and Asian continents, speak at such length. Exploitation, thus viewed, has many faces. But whatever guise it assumes, this evil is to be shunned where it does not exist and crushed where it does. It is the sacred duty of this Organization to ensure that the dream of equality is finally realized for all men to whom it is still denied, to guarantee that exploitation is not reincarnated in other forms in places whence it has already been banished.

As a free Africa has emerged during the past decade, a fresh attack has been launched against exploitation, wherever it still exists. And in that interaction so common to history, this in turn, has stimulated and encouraged the remaining dependent peoples to renewed efforts to throw off the yoke which has oppressed them and its claim as their birthright the twin ideals of liberty and equality. This very struggle is a struggle to establish peace, and until victory is assured, that brotherhood and understanding which nourish and give life to peace can be but partial and incomplete.

In the United States of America, the administration of President Kennedy is leading a vigorous attack to eradicate the remaining vestige of racial discrimination from this country. We know that this conflict will be won and that right will triumph. In this time of trial, these efforts should be encouraged and assisted, and we should lend our sympathy and support to the American Government today.

Last May, in Addis Ababa, I convened a meeting of Heads of African States and Governments. In three days, the thirty-two nations represented at that Conference demonstrated to the world that when the will and the determination exist, nations and peoples of diverse backgrounds can and will work together. in unity, to the achievement of common goals and the assurance of that equality and brotherhood which we desire.

On the question of racial discrimination, the Addis Ababa Conference taught, to those who will learn, this further lesson: That until the philosophy which holds one race superior and another inferior is finally and permanently discredited and abandoned: That until there are no longer first-class and second class citizens of any nation; That until the color of a man's skin is of no more significance than the color of his eyes; That until the basic human rights are equally guaranteed to all without regard to race; That until that day, the dream of lasting peace and world citizenship and the rule of international morality will remain but a fleeting illusion, to be pursued but never attained; And until the ignoble and unhappy regimes that hold our brothers in Angola, in Mozambique and in South Africa in subhuman bondage have been toppled and destroyed; Until bigotry and prejudice and malicious and inhuman self-interest have been replaced by understanding and tolerance and good-will; Until all Africans stand and speak as free beings, equal in the eyes of all men, as they are in the eyes of Heaven; Until that day, the African continent will not know peace. We Africans will fight, if necessary, and we know that we shall win, as we are confident in the victory of good over evil.

The United Nations has done much, both directly and indirectly to speed the disappearance of discrimination and oppression from the earth. Without the opportunity to focus world opinion on Africa and Asia which this Organization provides, the goal, for many, might still lie ahead, and the struggle would have taken far longer. For this, we are truly grateful.

But more can be done. The basis of racial discrimination and colonialism has been economic, and it is with economic weapons that these evils have been and can be overcome. In pursuance of resolutions adopted at the Addis Ababa Summit Conference, African States have undertaken certain measures in the economic field which, if adopted by all member states of the United Nations, would soon reduce intransigence to reason. I ask, today, for adherence to these measures by every nation represented here which is truly devoted to the principles enunciated in the Charter.

I do not believe that Portugal and South Africa are prepared to commit economic or physical suicide if honorable and reasonable alternatives exist. I believe that such alternatives can be found. But I also know that unless peaceful solutions are devised, counsels of moderation and temperance will avail for naught; and another blow will have been dealt to this Organization which will hamper and weaken still further its usefulness in the struggle to ensure the victory of peace and liberty over the forces of strife and oppression. Here, then, is the opportunity presented to us. We must act while we can, while the occasion exists to exert those legitimate pressures available to us, lest time run out and resort be had to less happy means.

Does this Organization today possess the authority and the will to act? And if it does not, are we prepared to clothe it with the power to create and enforce the rule of law? Or is the Charter a mere collection of words, without content and substance, because the essential spirit is lacking? The time in which to ponder these questions is all too short. The pages of history are full of instances in which the unwanted and the shunned nonetheless occurred because men waited to act until too late. We can brook no such delay.

If we are to survive, this Organization must survive. To survive, it must be strengthened. Its executive must be vested with great authority. The means for the enforcement of its decisions must be fortified, and, if they do not exist, they must be devised. Procedures must be established to protect the small and the weak when threatened by the strong and the mighty. All nations which fulfill the conditions of membership must be admitted and allowed to sit in this assemblage.

Equality of representation must be assured in each of its organs. The possibilities which exist in the United Nations to provide the medium whereby the hungry may be fed, the naked clothed, the ignorant instructed, must be seized on and exploited for the flower of peace is not sustained by poverty and want. To achieve this requires courage and confidence. The courage, I believe, we possess. The confidence must be created, and to create confidence we must act courageously.

The great nations of the world would do well to remember that in the modern age even their own fates are not wholly in their hands. Peace demands the united efforts of us all. Who can foresee what spark might ignite the fuse? It is not only the small and the weak who must scrupulously observe their obligations to the United Nations and to each other. Unless the smaller nations are accorded their proper voice in the settlement of the world's problems, unless the equality which Africa and Asia have struggled to attain is reflected in expanded membership in the institutions which make up the United Nations, confidence will come just that much harder. Unless the rights of the least of men are as assiduously protected as those of the greatest, the seeds of confidence will fall on barren soil.

The stake of each one of us is identical - life or death. We all wish to live. We all seek a world in which men are freed of the burdens of ignorance, poverty, hunger and disease. And we shall all be hard-pressed to escape the deadly rain of nuclear fall-out should catastrophe overtake us.

When I spoke at Geneva in 1936, there was no precedent for a head of state addressing the League of Nations. I am neither the first, nor will I be the last head of state to address the United Nations, but only I have addressed both the League and this Organization in this capacity. The problems which confront us today are, equally, unprecedented. They have no counterparts in human experience. Men search the pages of history for solutions, for precedents, but there are none. This, then, is the ultimate challenge. Where are we to look for our survival, for the answers to the questions which have never before been posed? We must look, first, to Almighty God, Who has raised man above the animals and endowed him with intelligence and reason. We must put our faith in Him, that He will not desert us or permit us to destroy humanity which He created in His image. And we must look into ourselves, into the depth of our souls. We must become something we have never been and for which our education and experience and environment have ill-prepared us. We must become bigger than we have been: more courageous, greater in spirit, larger in outlook. We must become members of a new race, overcoming petty prejudice, owing our ultimate allegiance not to nations but to our fellow men within the human community."

Oct. 6, 1963